Login
Student authentication

Is it the first time you are entering this system?
Use the following link to activate your id and create your password.
»  Create / Recover Password

Syllabus

EN IT

Learning Objectives

LEARNING OUTCOMES: The course aims to explore in a highly interactive managerial perspective the scientific/theoretical research on organizational behavior and its applications within the business practice.

KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: The goal of the course is to provide theories and tools and develop skills for the analysis of individual, group and organizational behaviors in complex environments, in order to:
- Understand and concretely use the theories and basic models of Organizational Behavior;
- Developing the ability to apply theory to practice

APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: The goal of the course is to provide theories and tools and develop skills for the analysis of individual, group and organizational behaviors in complex environments, in order to:
- To develop the ability to analyse, elaborate and solve complex organizational problems, both through the discussion of best practices and through the discussion of case studies.

MAKING JUDGEMENTS: By the end of the course students will have understood how:
- The study of organisational behaviour can help to improve the performance and well-being of people in the workplace;
- Models, theories and concepts concerning organisational behaviour can be used to promote the effectiveness of individuals, groups and organisations,
and will have developed:
- Skills, for the analysis of both the behavior of individuals (considered as individuals and/or groups), and the organizational functioning as a whole, useful to play more effectively the role of manager;
- A richer and more complex "representation" of organizational behavior in all its meanings that allows them to contribute more effectively to the development of the organization in which they will be placed.

COMMUNICATION SKILLS: Students will be asked to briefly illustrate their group presentation in Powerpoint. For this purpose, each case discussion requires a group of students to present their work.

LEARNING SKILLS: Students will be called to:
1. Take a specific position on certain issues and/or points.
2. Ask clarification questions.
3. Collaborate in order to keep the discussion alive.
4. Help guide and involve other students in the discussion.
5. Integrate the discussion with theories, contents and concepts already seen in other cases.

Prerequisites

None

Program

The course is divided into 4 sections, for a total of 36 sessions of two hours each:
Section I: The Individual and Work (14 lectures).
#1 Introduction to the Course: The Rules of the Game
#2 Organizational Behavior: History and Paths to the Future
#3 Personality, Perception, and Employee Attitudes (1/4)
#4 Personality, Perception, and Employee Attitudes (2/4)
#5 Personality, Perception, and Employee Attitudes (3/4)
#6 Personality, Perception, and Employee Attitudes (4/4)
#7 Values, Emotions, and Moods
#8 Motivational Theories (1/2)
#9 Motivational Theories (2/2)
#10 Motivation at Practice (1/2)
#11 Motivation at Practice (2/2)
#12 Learning
#13 Stress (1/2)
#14 Stress (2/2)

Section II: Group/Team and Work (12 lectures).
#15 Foundations of Group Behavior (1/2)
#16 Foundations of Group Behavior (2/2)
#17 Understanding Work Teams (1/2)
#18 Understanding Work Teams (2/2)
#19 Leadership (1/2)
#20 Leadership (2/2)
#21 Power, Politics, and Social Interactions (1/2)
#22 Power, Politics, and Social Interactions (2/2)
#23 Conflicts at Work (1/2)
#24 Conflicts at Work (2/2)
#25 Negotiations at Work (1/2)
#26 Negotiations at Work (2/2)

Section III: Organizational Structures and Systems (5 lectures).
#27 Structure, Control, and Performance in Organizations (1/3)
#28 Structure, Control, and Performance in Organizations (2/3)
#29 Structure, Control, and Performance in Organizations (3/3)
#30 Decision-Making, Problem-Solving, Creativity, and Innovation (1/2)
#31 Decision-Making, Problem-Solving, Creativity, and Innovation (2/2)

Section IV: Organizational Processes (5 lectures).
#32 Communication
#33 Organizational Culture (1/2)
#34 Organizational Culture (2/2)
#35 Organizational Change (1/2)
#36 Organizational Change (2/2)

Books

1. R. FINCHAM, P. RHODES, PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005.
2. F. LUTHANS, ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH 12TH EDITION, MCGRAW-HILL/IRWIN, 2011.
3. S. P. ROBBINS, T. A. JUDGE, ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 16TH EDITION, PEARSON EDUCATION, 2015.
4. D. A. BUCHANAN, A. A. HUCZYNSKI, ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR 9TH EDITION, PEARSON, 2017.
5. J. R. SCHERMERHORN, JR., J. G. HUNT, R. N. OSBORN, M. UHL-BIEN, ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR 11TH EDITION, JOHN WILEY & SONS INC., 2010.

Bibliography

Robins S., Judge T." Organizational behavior" 13 edition, Prentice-Hall International, 2005
• Contemporary management" Jones, George, McGraw Hill, 4th edition, 2006
• Managing Organizational Behavior" Jones, George, Prentice-Hall International, 2007
• "Organizational change" B. Senior, J. Fleming, Prentice-Hall International 3 edition, 2006
• "Management" Hitt, Black, Porter Prentice-Hall International, Second Edition, 2008
• Organizational behavior, Debra Nelson, James Campbell Quicl, THOMSON, SOUTHWESTERN, 5th edition
• Managing Behavior in Organizations, Jerald Greenberg, 5th edition Pearson
• Adler, P. S. 1999 International dimensions of organizational behavior London: International Thompson
• Argyris, C. 1960 Understanding Organisational behavior Homewood IL: Dorsey Press (HM300)
• Bandura, A. 1977 Social learning theory New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
• Barnard, C. The functions of the executive Cambridge: Harvard University Press
• Beer, M. et al. 1984 Managing human Assets New York: Free Press
• Braverman, H .1974 Labour and monopoly capital New York: Monthly Review Press (Open shelve)
• Bryman, A. 1986 Leadership and organizations London: Routledge Kegan Paul
• Buchanan, D. A. Organisation in the computer age Aldershot: Gower
• Burns, T & Stalker, G. M. The management of innovation London: Tavistock (Open shelve)
• Child, J. 1972 "Organisational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice" Sociology vol. 6 # 1 pp 1- 22
• Clegg, S. & Dunkerley, D. 1980 Organisations, class and control London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
• Conti, R. F. & Warner, M. 1993 "Taylorism, new technology and just-in-time systems in Japanese Manufacturing" New Technology, work and employment, vol 8 # 100 31- 42
• Cyert, R. & March, J. G. 1992 A behavioral theory of the firm NJ: Prentice-Hall Englewoods Cliffs
• Dubin, E. (ed) 1976 Handbook of Work, Organisation and Society Chicago Rand McNally
• Drucker, P. F. 1988 Management challenges in the 21st Century London: Heinemann
• Drucker, P. F. 1989 The new realities London: Heinemann
• Duncan, R. B. 1974 "Modifications in decision making structures in adapting to the environment: some Implications for organizational learning" Decision sciences vol, 5 pp 704 –25
• Duncan, w. J. 1981 Organisational Behaviour Houghton: Mifflin
• French, J & Raven. B. 1958 "The bases of social power 'in D. Cartwright Studies in social Power Ann Arbor Institute for Social Research (HM301)
• Gibson, J.L. et al. 1994 Organisations: Behaviour structure and processes (Reserve)
• Gouldner, A. W. 1954 Patterns of industrial Bureaucracy New York: Free Press
• Gruneberg, M. & Wall, T.(eds) Social Psychology and organizational behavior Chichester: John Wiley
• Hall, E. T . Understanding Cultural differences Yarmouth: Intercultural Press
• Handy, C 1999 Understanding Organisations 4th ed London: Penguin (Reserve HD31HAN)
• Hofstede, G. 1991 Cultures and Organisations London: McGraw –Hill
• Hodgetts, R. M. 1991 Organisational behavior: Theory and practice New York: Macmillan company
• Kast, F.E. & Rosenzweig, J.E. Organization &Management11985 4th ed New jersey McGraw-hill (Reserve HD31KAS)
• Kotter, J. P. 1990 "what do leaders really do?" in Harvard Business review 73 pp59-67
• Mintzberg, H. 1983a Power in and around organizations New York: Prentice-Hall
• Mintzberg, H. 1983b Structures in fives: designing effective organizations Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Moorhead, G. and Griffin, R. w. 1998 Organisational Behaviour 5th edition Houghton: Mifflin Company
• Mullins, L. Management and Organisational behavior London: Pitman, The financial times (Reserve)
• Perrow, C. 1970 Organisational analysis: A sociological review Belmont: Wadsworth
• Robbins, S. P. 1998 Organisational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications NJ: Prentice-Hall (Reserve)
• Simon, H 1957 Administrative behavior NY: Macmillan
• Schein, E. H. 1975 Organisational culture and Leadership San Francisco: Jossey-bass

Teaching methods

The Organizational Behavior course employs various teaching methods to facilitate effective student learning and engagement. The course aims to create an interactive and participatory learning environment where students can actively apply the concepts and theories they have learned to real-world situations. The teaching methods include the following:
1. Readings: Students will be assigned readings from the course textbooks. These readings provide a theoretical foundation and background knowledge on the topics covered in the course. Students are expected to complete the assigned readings before each session to facilitate class discussions and activities.
2. Lectures: The instructor will deliver lectures highlighting key points, providing additional information, and supplementing the readings. The lectures will offer a structured presentation of the course material, ensuring that students grasp the fundamental concepts and theories. However, the lectures will not be limited to one-way communication, as student engagement and participation will be encouraged through discussions and questions.
3. Exercises: Various exercises and in-class activities will be conducted to enhance understanding and practical application of the course material. These exercises may include group discussions, role-plays, simulations, and problem-solving tasks. The exercises aim to promote critical thinking, collaboration, and the integration of knowledge in a hands-on manner.
4. Case Studies: Business cases will be used extensively throughout the course to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Students will analyze and discuss real-world cases that present organizational behavior challenges and dilemmas. Students will be given case assignments, which they must complete before each session. These assignments are a foundation for class discussions, allowing students to apply theoretical concepts to real-life scenarios and develop analytical and problem-solving skills.
5. Individual and Team Assignments: Students can work on individual and team assignments. Individual assignments may include Case Studies and Supporting Case Studies. Team assignments may involve collaborative projects, presentations, or group research. These assignments encourage students to deepen their understanding of the material, promote teamwork and communication skills, and foster critical thinking and analysis.
6. Discussions: Students are encouraged to actively participate in discussions, share their perspectives, ask questions, and engage in debates related to the course topics. The diversity of experiences and viewpoints among the students enriches the learning environment and enables the exploration of different perspectives and solutions to organizational behavior challenges.
7. MScBA Teaching Assistant: The Class will be assigned a Teaching Assistant (TA) from the MScBA program. The TA will serve as a mentor and provide additional support to students throughout the course. They will assist in clarifying course concepts, facilitating discussions, and offering guidance on assignments and assessments. The TA's role is further to enhance students' understanding of the course material and provide personalized assistance as needed.

Exam Rules

MID-COURSE TEST

The mid-course exam is a critical component of the Organisational Dynamics and Behavior course evaluation. The following details provide a comprehensive understanding of the test format, duration, content, and its impact on the student's final grade:
Test format and duration
The mid-course exam is a written test lasting 3 hours. During this time, the candidate will have to answer a series of questions that assess their understanding of the course material.
Content and question types
The test includes questions directly related to the course lectures and textbooks. The questions can be of various types, including open-ended, closed (multiple-choice), or a combination of both. The purpose of this varied question format is to evaluate the understanding of the course content from different perspectives.
In addition to assessing the knowledge of critical concepts, theories, and models covered in the course, the test may include questions that require the analysis and interpretation of real-life incidents or scenarios. These questions aim to assess the ability to apply theoretical frameworks to practical situations and focus on specific theoretical issues discussed in class.
Evaluation and bonus points
Students can earn up to +3 extra points towards their final grade of the 1st exam after the course through the mid-course exam. These extra points apply only to the 1st exam after the course.
Importance and validity of mid-course test points
The extra points obtained through the mid-course test serve to improve the grade, particularly for the 1st exam after the course. It is important to note that these points do not affect subsequent exams or assignments.
By performing well on the mid-course test, it is possible to improve the overall course grade, as the bonus points enhance the final result of the first exam after the course.
Preparing thoroughly for the mid-course test is essential by reviewing lecture notes, textbooks, and any other material provided during the course. Additionally, engagement in critical thinking and active participation in class discussions can significantly improve exam performance.
Final Exam
The final exam is a written test lasting about 3-4 hours and includes:
a) Case discussion
You may receive a case study with several questions to guide the discussion. When answering the questions, please use specific content and theories (name approaches and models) for your analysis. You will not receive credit for your opinions unless supported by theory, lectures, and textbook material. Additionally, describe how the content/theory applies to the situation. Answers will be evaluated based on quantity and quality. Comprehensive solutions demonstrating a high understanding and analysis will receive more points.
b) Some questions directly related to the course textbooks
These can be open-ended, closed (multiple choice), or a combination. You may be asked to discuss the models and theories presented during the course. You must interpret some real episodes and focus on specific theoretical issues.
If the number of students enrolled on a given exam date is less than ten, the instructors will conduct an oral exam instead of a written one.
Results will be communicated through the Delphi system, and students may also receive an individual illustration of their written test outcomes via interviews with the instructors.
The exam will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
• Unsatisfactory: Significant gaps and/or inaccuracies in the knowledge and understanding of topics; limited analytical and synthesis skills, frequent generalizations, and limited critical and judgment skills; topics are presented inconsistently and with inappropriate language.
• 18-20: Barely sufficient knowledge and understanding of topics with possible generalizations and imperfections; sufficient analytical, synthesis, and judgment autonomy skills; topics are often presented inconsistently and with inappropriate/technical language.
• 21-23: Routine knowledge and understanding of topics; correct analytical and synthesis skills with sufficiently coherent logical argumentation and appropriate/technical language.
• 24-26: Fair knowledge and understanding of topics; good analytical and synthesis skills with rigorously expressed arguments but with not always appropriate/technical language.
• 27-29: Complete knowledge and understanding of topics; notable analytical and synthesis skills; good judgment autonomy. Topics presented rigorously and with appropriate/technical language.
• 30-30L: Excellent level of knowledge and in-depth understanding of topics. Excellent analytical, synthesis, and judgment autonomy skills. Arguments expressed originally and with appropriate technical language.