BUSINESS GOVERNMENT RELATIONSHIPS
Syllabus
EN
IT
- Slides proiettate durante il corso
- Note del professore sugli argomenti
- Discussioni in aula condotte dal docente
- Discussione sui lavori di gruppo
- Assignment su casi studio
Learning Objectives
LEARNING OUTCOMES: The main objective is to provide an in-depth knowledge of the relationships between business organizations and goverment, with particular reference to public-private partnerships (PPPs).
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to understand the risks and benefits of PPPs, to be able to identify in which context the creation of these partnerships takes place, to know how to identify how PPPs influence both the strategies of private companies and the processes of value creation in the public sector .
APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to be able to analyze different situations and problems through the application of techniques and tools learned during the lessons.
MAKING JUDGEMENTS: to be able to use the knowledge acquired during the course to assess the pros and the cons of PPPs.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS: to devolelop communication skills, using appropriate business language.
LEARNING SKILLS: to develop the skills necessary to undertake subsequent studies with a high degree of autonomy
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to understand the risks and benefits of PPPs, to be able to identify in which context the creation of these partnerships takes place, to know how to identify how PPPs influence both the strategies of private companies and the processes of value creation in the public sector .
APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to be able to analyze different situations and problems through the application of techniques and tools learned during the lessons.
MAKING JUDGEMENTS: to be able to use the knowledge acquired during the course to assess the pros and the cons of PPPs.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS: to devolelop communication skills, using appropriate business language.
LEARNING SKILLS: to develop the skills necessary to undertake subsequent studies with a high degree of autonomy
Prerequisites
Basic knowledge on management
Program
- Why does Government intervene in markets? (sources of market failure)
- Pros and cons of government intervention (source of government failure)
- Types of possible relationships between businesses and government
- Public-private partnerships
- The critical aspects of BGR relationships (lobbing, corruption etc)
- Pros and cons of government intervention (source of government failure)
- Types of possible relationships between businesses and government
- Public-private partnerships
- The critical aspects of BGR relationships (lobbing, corruption etc)
Books
- Teaching notes of the course (available on-line)
- Slides projected during the course
- Suggested articles
- Slides projected during the course
- Suggested articles
Teaching methods
- Slides proiettate durante il corso
- Note del professore sugli argomenti
- Discussioni in aula condotte dal docente
- Discussione sui lavori di gruppo
- Assignment su casi studio
Exam Rules
For attending students there are some classroom activities carried out in groups that contribute to the final assessment (50% of the overall grade). The final exam is written and consists of 15 multiple choice questions (1 point for each correct answer) and 3 open questions (max 5 points for each answer). The overall mark for those attending is the average of the mark obtained for class activities and the mark of the written exam.
For non-attending students there is a written exam consisting of 15 multiple choice questions (1 point for each correct answer) and 5 open questions (max 3 points for each answer).
The minimum grade to pass the exam is 18.
The exam will be assessed according to the following criteria:
Not sufficient: important deficiencies and / or inaccuracies in the knowledge and understanding of the topics; limited capacity of analysis and synthesis, frequent generalizations and limited critical and judgment skills, the arguments are presented in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate language;
18-20: just sufficient knowledge and understanding of the topics with possible generalizations and imperfections; sufficient capacity of analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the topics are frequently exposed in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate / technical language;
21-23: Routine knowledge and understanding of topics; Ability to correct analysis and synthesis with sufficiently coherent logical argument and appropriate / technical language
24-26: Fair knowledge and understanding of the topics; good analysis and synthesis skills with rigorously expressed arguments but with a language that is not always appropriate / technical.
27-29: Complete knowledge and understanding of the topics; remarkable abilities of analysis and synthesis. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics exposed rigorously and with appropriate / technical language
30-30L: Excellent level of knowledge and in-depth understanding of the topics. Excellent skills of analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment. Arguments expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language.
For non-attending students there is a written exam consisting of 15 multiple choice questions (1 point for each correct answer) and 5 open questions (max 3 points for each answer).
The minimum grade to pass the exam is 18.
The exam will be assessed according to the following criteria:
Not sufficient: important deficiencies and / or inaccuracies in the knowledge and understanding of the topics; limited capacity of analysis and synthesis, frequent generalizations and limited critical and judgment skills, the arguments are presented in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate language;
18-20: just sufficient knowledge and understanding of the topics with possible generalizations and imperfections; sufficient capacity of analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the topics are frequently exposed in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate / technical language;
21-23: Routine knowledge and understanding of topics; Ability to correct analysis and synthesis with sufficiently coherent logical argument and appropriate / technical language
24-26: Fair knowledge and understanding of the topics; good analysis and synthesis skills with rigorously expressed arguments but with a language that is not always appropriate / technical.
27-29: Complete knowledge and understanding of the topics; remarkable abilities of analysis and synthesis. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics exposed rigorously and with appropriate / technical language
30-30L: Excellent level of knowledge and in-depth understanding of the topics. Excellent skills of analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment. Arguments expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language.