Syllabus
EN
IT
Learning Objectives
LEARNING OUTCOMES: to provide a basic knowledge of all the elements of business administration.
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to understand business administration and the fundamentals of business management (strategy, organization, measurement, reporting) managerial functions (marketing, financial function, human resources, etc.) Understand what the role is of business organizations in society, theri responsibilities and how they create value.
APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to be able to apply one's knowledge and draw original conclusions, using managerial tools and techniques.
MAKING JUDGEMENTS: to be able to use the knowledge acquired during the course to assess the pros and the cons of managerial actions.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS: to devolelop communication skills, using appropriate business language.
LEARNING SKILLS: to develop the skills necessary to undertake subsequent studies with a high degree of autonomy
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to understand business administration and the fundamentals of business management (strategy, organization, measurement, reporting) managerial functions (marketing, financial function, human resources, etc.) Understand what the role is of business organizations in society, theri responsibilities and how they create value.
APPLYING KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING: to be able to apply one's knowledge and draw original conclusions, using managerial tools and techniques.
MAKING JUDGEMENTS: to be able to use the knowledge acquired during the course to assess the pros and the cons of managerial actions.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS: to devolelop communication skills, using appropriate business language.
LEARNING SKILLS: to develop the skills necessary to undertake subsequent studies with a high degree of autonomy
SANDRO BRUNELLI
Prerequisites
Nothing
Program
In order to reach its objectives, the course is articulated into the following seven parts, which will take, on average, 2 weeks for each. They are:
–Part I. Economic problem, organizations and aziende;
–Part II. Value creation in business and non-business entities;
–Part III. Conflicts with the primary interest of the economic entity;
–Part IV. The activity of business entities through circuits;
–Part V. Legal forms of business entities;
–Part VI. Organizational structure;
–Part VII. Strategies.
–Part I. Economic problem, organizations and aziende;
–Part II. Value creation in business and non-business entities;
–Part III. Conflicts with the primary interest of the economic entity;
–Part IV. The activity of business entities through circuits;
–Part V. Legal forms of business entities;
–Part VI. Organizational structure;
–Part VII. Strategies.
Books
Teaching notes of "Findamentals of business. Towards the primary interest of the firm as a guiding principle and common good". It will be available for free in the teaching materials
Bibliography
It corresponds to the materials indicated in the adopted texts section.
Teaching methods
Conventional lecture mode (frontal lesson) and interactive (the students will be required participate actively in the class discussions and group work). £ sessions per week, 2 hours each.
Exam Rules
The method of assessment is based on Written Exam + Project Work + Assignments
The exam, the related trials and the evaluation model will be the same for attending and non-attending students;
If the written exam is passed with at least 18, students may refuse the score and come back to the next exam date (Please, come if you are well prepared!). The score obtained to the next exam date eliminate the previous one. If the score of the written exam is lower than 15 students cannot come in the next exam date;
At the end of the course there is the possibility to do a pre-exam that exonerate from the written exam of January. The final score of the pre exam is valid only for the first session (January).
For the Project Work (30% of the final mark) attending and non-attending students must present a word file and:
Attending and non-attending students can discuss their Project Work during the course (see the analytical syllabus). Presenters are exempt from the oral exam on the PW. In order to be exempt from the oral exam on the PW students need to present their PW in one of the scheduled dates;
Non-attending students and attending students who decide not to discuss the PW on the scheduled dates, have two possibilities:
they can discuss the PW on the exam date they choose for the examination. It is strongly recommended that the PW is presented, using a PPT presentation, on the same day by all members of the group. If it is not possible (e.g. because some group members are still in Erasmus) every student will be examined separately;
attending and non-attending students can also record the video of the PW discussion, uploading-it on YouTube (click here for an example).
Since the PW is strongly related to the theory asked in the written exam, the evaluation of the single student for the PW will take into account the presentation (during the course or using the YouTube video) as well as the final mark of the written exam in case of more than 5 points of discrepancy. For example, if the final mark of the PW presented by two students is 28, but one pass the written exam with 25 and the other with 18, the former will have confirmed 28 for the PW (since the discrepancy is less than 5 points, i.e. 3 points) while for the latter (the discrepancy is more than 5 points, i.e. 10 points!) the score of the PW will be the average (18+28)/2, that is 23. If the score of the written exam is higher than that of the PW, the score of the PW will not be adjusted, regardless of the discrepancy. Thus if you get 30 on the written exam and 18 to the PW, the final score of the PW is 18.
The Assignment is worth 20% of the final mark. Students have to bring the printed copy of their assignments that will be evaluated by the professor. The assignment must be completed for the date chosen for the exam. Students do not have to complete the assignment for the pre-exam.
EXAMPLE:
Written exam: 25
Project work: 30
Assignments: 25
Final score = Written exam + Project work + Assignment = (25*60%) + (30*30%) + (25*20%) = 15 + 9 + 2,5 = 26.5 = 27
Pre-exam: Attending and non-attending students can do the pre-exam. However, it will be focused on the topics discussed during the course.
The exam will be assessed according to the following criteria:
Not suitable: important deficiencies and / or inaccuracies in the knowledge and understanding of the topics; limited capacity for analysis and synthesis, frequent generalizations and limited critical and judgment skills, the arguments are presented in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate language;
18-20: just sufficient knowledge and understanding of the topics with possible generalizations and imperfections; sufficient capacity for analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the topics are frequently exposed in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate / technical language;
21-23: Routine knowledge and understanding of topics; Ability to correct analysis and synthesis with sufficiently coherent logical argument and appropriate / technical language
24-26: Fair knowledge and understanding of the topics; good analysis and synthesis skills with rigorously expressed arguments but with a language that is not always appropriate / technical.
27-29: Complete knowledge and understanding of the topics; remarkable abilities of analysis and synthesis. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics exposed rigorously and with appropriate / technical language
30-30L: Excellent level of knowledge and in-depth understanding of the topics. Excellent skills of analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment. Arguments expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language.
The exam, the related trials and the evaluation model will be the same for attending and non-attending students;
If the written exam is passed with at least 18, students may refuse the score and come back to the next exam date (Please, come if you are well prepared!). The score obtained to the next exam date eliminate the previous one. If the score of the written exam is lower than 15 students cannot come in the next exam date;
At the end of the course there is the possibility to do a pre-exam that exonerate from the written exam of January. The final score of the pre exam is valid only for the first session (January).
For the Project Work (30% of the final mark) attending and non-attending students must present a word file and:
Attending and non-attending students can discuss their Project Work during the course (see the analytical syllabus). Presenters are exempt from the oral exam on the PW. In order to be exempt from the oral exam on the PW students need to present their PW in one of the scheduled dates;
Non-attending students and attending students who decide not to discuss the PW on the scheduled dates, have two possibilities:
they can discuss the PW on the exam date they choose for the examination. It is strongly recommended that the PW is presented, using a PPT presentation, on the same day by all members of the group. If it is not possible (e.g. because some group members are still in Erasmus) every student will be examined separately;
attending and non-attending students can also record the video of the PW discussion, uploading-it on YouTube (click here for an example).
Since the PW is strongly related to the theory asked in the written exam, the evaluation of the single student for the PW will take into account the presentation (during the course or using the YouTube video) as well as the final mark of the written exam in case of more than 5 points of discrepancy. For example, if the final mark of the PW presented by two students is 28, but one pass the written exam with 25 and the other with 18, the former will have confirmed 28 for the PW (since the discrepancy is less than 5 points, i.e. 3 points) while for the latter (the discrepancy is more than 5 points, i.e. 10 points!) the score of the PW will be the average (18+28)/2, that is 23. If the score of the written exam is higher than that of the PW, the score of the PW will not be adjusted, regardless of the discrepancy. Thus if you get 30 on the written exam and 18 to the PW, the final score of the PW is 18.
The Assignment is worth 20% of the final mark. Students have to bring the printed copy of their assignments that will be evaluated by the professor. The assignment must be completed for the date chosen for the exam. Students do not have to complete the assignment for the pre-exam.
EXAMPLE:
Written exam: 25
Project work: 30
Assignments: 25
Final score = Written exam + Project work + Assignment = (25*60%) + (30*30%) + (25*20%) = 15 + 9 + 2,5 = 26.5 = 27
Pre-exam: Attending and non-attending students can do the pre-exam. However, it will be focused on the topics discussed during the course.
The exam will be assessed according to the following criteria:
Not suitable: important deficiencies and / or inaccuracies in the knowledge and understanding of the topics; limited capacity for analysis and synthesis, frequent generalizations and limited critical and judgment skills, the arguments are presented in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate language;
18-20: just sufficient knowledge and understanding of the topics with possible generalizations and imperfections; sufficient capacity for analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment, the topics are frequently exposed in an inconsistent way and with inappropriate / technical language;
21-23: Routine knowledge and understanding of topics; Ability to correct analysis and synthesis with sufficiently coherent logical argument and appropriate / technical language
24-26: Fair knowledge and understanding of the topics; good analysis and synthesis skills with rigorously expressed arguments but with a language that is not always appropriate / technical.
27-29: Complete knowledge and understanding of the topics; remarkable abilities of analysis and synthesis. Good autonomy of judgment. Topics exposed rigorously and with appropriate / technical language
30-30L: Excellent level of knowledge and in-depth understanding of the topics. Excellent skills of analysis, synthesis and autonomy of judgment. Arguments expressed in an original way and with appropriate technical language.